Maurizio Boffadossi, Federico Savorgnan


Paraglider sail (canopy) consists of a series of flexible boxes pressurized by special openings located at the leading edge, in the region near to the front stagnation point. Therefore, in order to avoid the deflation of the wing, the pressure inside the sail must remain above a certain threshold. To investigate this problem it has been considered an airfoil with a typical paraglider geometry equipped with air intakes. The aerodynamic behavior was determined performing experimental, Xfoil and CFD numerical analysis. Hollow models were made by a rapid prototyping and have been tested in a wind tunnel, measuring forces and moments on the profile and the pressure inside the canopy. Making different considerations, concerning the relationship between the internal pressure of the canopy and the upstream pressure gradient of the inlet, the results regarding the airfoil equipped with inlets have been compared with another airfoil with same geometries but without inlets. The pressure inside the airfoil has been satisfactorily related with numerical estimations and, subsequently, a new airfoil shape, with a different configuration of the inlets, has been developed by using an optimization process based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm. The new shape optimizes the internal pressure, especially at low angle of attack, according to the fact that the internal pressurization is a fundamental for safety flight requirements.


Aerodynamics; Paraglider; Airfoil; Wind Tunnel; Experimental tests; Rapid Prototyping

Full Text:



M. Dale, D. Thompson. BHPA Pilot Handbook. British Hang Gliding & Paragliding Association, 2008.

B. Goldsmith. Fifty Ways to Fly Better. Cross Country, 2013.

M. N. Uddin, M. Mashud. Wind Tunnel Test of a Paraglider (flexible) Wing Canopy. International Journal of Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS, 10(3), 7–13, 2010.

M. Mashud, A. Umemura. Experimental Investigation on Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Paraglider Wing. The Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 49(163), 9–17, 2006.

M. Mashud, A. Umemura. Three-Dimensional Measurements of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Paraglider Canopy Cells. The Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 49(163), 146–153, 2006.

K. Hanke, S. Schenk. Evaluating the Geometric Shape of a Flying Paraglider. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Vol. XL – 5, 265, 2014.

H. Belloc. Wind Tunnel Investigation of a Rigid Paraglider Reference Wing. Journal of Aircraft, 52(2), 703–708, 2015.

M. Drela. XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, edited by T. J. Mueller, Vol. 54 of Lecture Notes in Engineering, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1–12, 1989.

M. Drela, M.B Giles. Viscous-Inviscid Analysis of Transonic and Low Reynolds Number Airfoils. AIAA Journal, 25(10), 1347–1355, 1987.

OpenFOAM. The Open Source CFD Toolbox., Rel. 2.4.0, May 22, 2015.

P. R. Spalart, S. R. Allmaras. A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. AIAA Paper, 92–0439, 1992.

H. Babinsky. Aerodynamic Improvements of Paraglider Performance. AIAA Paper, 99–3148, 1999.

F. Pieri, L. Armant, D. Dagault. Ozone Shark Nose Technology. Patent FR2972422 (A1), September 14, 2012.

D. Kalyanmoy. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. JohnWiley & Sons Ltd, 2001.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved.